Opened 10 months ago
Closed 8 months ago
#338 closed question (answered)
Messbereich
| Reported by: | (none) | Owned by: | Jan-Hendrik Otto |
|---|---|---|---|
| Priority: | major | Milestone: | |
| Component: | Messsystem | Severity: | |
| Keywords: | Cc: | ||
| Data type: | Deadline: | ||
| Depending on: | Implements: | ||
| Memaddress: | Observerlist: | ||
| Parent: | #15 | Answer: | |
| Type: | Revieweraccept: | ||
| Reviewerlist: | Reviewerreject: | ||
| Priority: | normal | Visibility: | |
| Writable: | Class: | ||
| Criticality: |
Description
Woher wissen wir, dass ein Messbereich von 1:200, laut Kommentar vom 12.07. entsprechend Q_min/2 (in Bezug auf GT400 vermutlich), mit der geforderten Genauigkeit machbar ist?
Change History (2)
comment:1 by , 9 months ago
| Owner: | changed from to |
|---|---|
| Reporter: | removed |
comment:2 by , 8 months ago
| Resolution: | → answered |
|---|---|
| Status: | assigned → closed |
Note:
See TracTickets
for help on using tickets.
![(please configure the [header_logo] section in trac.ini)](/rsm600_req/chrome/site/rmglogo.png)
Wir wissen nicht mit 100 % Sicherheit, ob es möglich ist. So ist es mit vielen Anforderungen, vor allem aus der Messtechnik.